PPP
PPP (Point-to-Point Protocol) and its control protocols
Within this page
PPP subjects:
- PPPoE7 RFCs
PPP RFCs (112)
RFC 6431: Huawei Port Range Configuration Options for PPP IP Control Protocol (IPCP)
Informational- M. Boucadair
- P. Levis
- G. Bajko
- T. Savolainen
- T. Tsou
- November 2011
- Independent Stream publication
Abstract
This document defines two Huawei IPCP (IP Control Protocol) options used to convey a set of ports. These options can be used in the context of port range-based solutions or NAT-based solutions for port delegation and forwarding purposes. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
Abstract
This document defines two Huawei IPCP (IP Control Protocol) options used to convey a set of ports. These options can be used in the context of port range-based solutions or NAT-based solutions for port delegation and forwarding purposes. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
RFC 6361: PPP Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Protocol Control Protocol
Proposed Standard- J. Carlson
- D. Eastlake 3rd
- August 2011
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) defines a Link Control Protocol (LCP) and a method for negotiating the use of multiprotocol traffic over point-to-point links. This document describes PPP support for the Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Protocol, allowing direct communication between Routing Bridges (RBridges) via PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) defines a Link Control Protocol (LCP) and a method for negotiating the use of multiprotocol traffic over point-to-point links. This document describes PPP support for the Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Protocol, allowing direct communication between Routing Bridges (RBridges) via PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 5172: Negotiation for IPv6 Datagram Compression Using IPv6 Control Protocol
Proposed Standard- S. Varada
- March 2008
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method of encapsulating network-layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols.
The IPv6 Control Protocol (IPV6CP), which is an NCP for a PPP link, allows for the negotiation of desirable parameters for an IPv6 interface over PPP.
This document defines the IPv6 datagram compression option that can be negotiated by a node on the link through the IPV6CP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method of encapsulating network-layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols.
The IPv6 Control Protocol (IPV6CP), which is an NCP for a PPP link, allows for the negotiation of desirable parameters for an IPv6 interface over PPP.
This document defines the IPv6 datagram compression option that can be negotiated by a node on the link through the IPV6CP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 5072: IP Version 6 over PPP
Draft Standard- S. Varada
- D. Haskins
- E. Allen
- September 2007
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method of encapsulating network-layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols.
This document defines the method for sending IPv6 packets over PPP links, the NCP for establishing and configuring the IPv6 over PPP, and the method for forming IPv6 link-local addresses on PPP links.
It also specifies the conditions for performing Duplicate Address Detection on IPv6 global unicast addresses configured for PPP links either through stateful or stateless address autoconfiguration.
This document obsoletes RFC 2472. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method of encapsulating network-layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols.
This document defines the method for sending IPv6 packets over PPP links, the NCP for establishing and configuring the IPv6 over PPP, and the method for forming IPv6 link-local addresses on PPP links.
It also specifies the conditions for performing Duplicate Address Detection on IPv6 global unicast addresses configured for PPP links either through stateful or stateless address autoconfiguration.
This document obsoletes RFC 2472. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4618: Encapsulation Methods for Transport of PPP/High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) over MPLS Networks
Proposed Standard- L. Martini
- E. Rosen
- G. Heron
- A. Malis
- September 2006
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
A pseudowire (PW) can be used to carry Point to Point Protocol (PPP) or High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) Protocol Data Units over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) network without terminating the PPP/HDLC protocol. This enables service providers to offer "emulated" HDLC, or PPP link services over existing MPLS networks. This document specifies the encapsulation of PPP/HDLC Packet Data Units (PDUs) within a pseudowire. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
A pseudowire (PW) can be used to carry Point to Point Protocol (PPP) or High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) Protocol Data Units over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) network without terminating the PPP/HDLC protocol. This enables service providers to offer "emulated" HDLC, or PPP link services over existing MPLS networks. This document specifies the encapsulation of PPP/HDLC Packet Data Units (PDUs) within a pseudowire. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4334: Certificate Extensions and Attributes Supporting Authentication in Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) and Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN)
Proposed Standard- R. Housley
- T. Moore
- February 2006
- IETF publication
- Security Area
Abstract
This document defines two Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) extended key usage values and a public key certificate extension to carry Wireless LAN (WLAN) System Service identifiers (SSIDs). This document obsoletes RFC 3770. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines two Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) extended key usage values and a public key certificate extension to carry Wireless LAN (WLAN) System Service identifiers (SSIDs). This document obsoletes RFC 3770. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4332: Cisco's Mobile IPv4 Host Configuration Extensions
Informational- K. Leung
- A. Patel
- G. Tsirtsis
- E. Klovning
- December 2005
- Independent Stream publication
Abstract
An IP device requires basic host configuration to be able to communicate. For example, it will typically require an IP address and the address of a DNS server. This information is configured statically or obtained dynamically using Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) or Point-to-Point Protocol/IP Control Protocol (PPP/IPCP). However, both DHCP and PPP/IPCP provide host configuration based on the access network. In Mobile IPv4, the registration process boots up a Mobile Node at an access network, also known as a foreign network. The information to configure the host needs to be based on the home network. This document describes the Cisco vendor-specific extensions to Mobile IPv4 to provide the base host configuration in Registration Request and Reply messages. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
An IP device requires basic host configuration to be able to communicate. For example, it will typically require an IP address and the address of a DNS server. This information is configured statically or obtained dynamically using Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) or Point-to-Point Protocol/IP Control Protocol (PPP/IPCP). However, both DHCP and PPP/IPCP provide host configuration based on the access network. In Mobile IPv4, the registration process boots up a Mobile Node at an access network, also known as a foreign network. The information to configure the host needs to be based on the home network. This document describes the Cisco vendor-specific extensions to Mobile IPv4 to provide the base host configuration in Registration Request and Reply messages. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 4045: Extensions to Support Efficient Carrying of Multicast Traffic in Layer-2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
Experimental- G. Bourdon
- April 2005
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a method for tunneling PPP packets. This document describes an extension to L2TP, to make efficient use of L2TP tunnels within the context of deploying multicast services whose data will have to be conveyed by these tunnels. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Abstract
The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a method for tunneling PPP packets. This document describes an extension to L2TP, to make efficient use of L2TP tunnels within the context of deploying multicast services whose data will have to be conveyed by these tunnels. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 3931: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3)
Proposed Standard- J. Lau
- M. Townsley
- I. Goyret
- March 2005
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document describes "version 3" of the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TPv3). L2TPv3 defines the base control protocol and encapsulation for tunneling multiple Layer 2 connections between two IP nodes. Additional documents detail the specifics for each data link type being emulated. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes "version 3" of the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TPv3). L2TPv3 defines the base control protocol and encapsulation for tunneling multiple Layer 2 connections between two IP nodes. Additional documents detail the specifics for each data link type being emulated. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3748: Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)
Proposed Standard- B. Aboba
- L. Blunk
- J. Vollbrecht
- J. Carlson
- H. Levkowetz
- June 2004
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP), an authentication framework which supports multiple authentication methods. EAP typically runs directly over data link layers such as Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) or IEEE 802, without requiring IP. EAP provides its own support for duplicate elimination and retransmission, but is reliant on lower layer ordering guarantees. Fragmentation is not supported within EAP itself; however, individual EAP methods may support this. This document obsoletes RFC 2284. A summary of the changes between this document and RFC 2284 is available in Appendix A. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP), an authentication framework which supports multiple authentication methods. EAP typically runs directly over data link layers such as Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) or IEEE 802, without requiring IP. EAP provides its own support for duplicate elimination and retransmission, but is reliant on lower layer ordering guarantees. Fragmentation is not supported within EAP itself; however, individual EAP methods may support this. This document obsoletes RFC 2284. A summary of the changes between this document and RFC 2284 is available in Appendix A. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3818: BCP 88: IANA Considerations for the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
Best Current Practice- V. Schryver
- June 2004
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The charter of the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Extensions working group (pppext) includes the responsibility to "actively advance PPP's most useful extensions to full standard, while defending against further enhancements of questionable value." In support of that charter, the allocation of PPP protocol and other assigned numbers will no longer be "first come first served." This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Abstract
The charter of the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Extensions working group (pppext) includes the responsibility to "actively advance PPP's most useful extensions to full standard, while defending against further enhancements of questionable value." In support of that charter, the allocation of PPP protocol and other assigned numbers will no longer be "first come first served." This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
RFC 3772: Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Vendor Protocol
Proposed Standard- J. Carlson
- R. Winslow
- May 2004
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) defines a Link Control Protocol (LCP) and a method for negotiating the use of multi-protocol traffic over point-to-point links. The PPP Vendor Extensions document adds vendor-specific general-purpose Configuration Option and Code numbers. This document extends these features to cover vendor-specific Network, Authentication, and Control Protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) defines a Link Control Protocol (LCP) and a method for negotiating the use of multi-protocol traffic over point-to-point links. The PPP Vendor Extensions document adds vendor-specific general-purpose Configuration Option and Code numbers. This document extends these features to cover vendor-specific Network, Authentication, and Control Protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3770: Certificate Extensions and Attributes Supporting Authentication in Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) and Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN)
Proposed Standard- R. Housley
- T. Moore
- May 2004
- IETF publication
- Security Area
Abstract
This document defines two EAP extended key usage values and a public key certificate extension to carry Wireless LAN (WLAN) System Service identifiers (SSIDs). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4334
Abstract
This document defines two EAP extended key usage values and a public key certificate extension to carry Wireless LAN (WLAN) System Service identifiers (SSIDs). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3544: IP Header Compression over PPP
Proposed Standard- T. Koren
- S. Casner
- C. Bormann
- July 2003
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document describes an option for negotiating the use of header compression on IP datagrams transmitted over the Point-to-Point Protocol (RFC 1661). It defines extensions to the PPP Control Protocols for IPv4 and IPv6 (RFC 1332, RFC 2472). Header compression may be applied to IPv4 and IPv6 datagrams in combination with TCP, UDP and RTP transport protocols as specified in RFC 2507, RFC 2508 and RFC 3545. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes an option for negotiating the use of header compression on IP datagrams transmitted over the Point-to-Point Protocol (RFC 1661). It defines extensions to the PPP Control Protocols for IPv4 and IPv6 (RFC 1332, RFC 2472). Header compression may be applied to IPv4 and IPv6 datagrams in combination with TCP, UDP and RTP transport protocols as specified in RFC 2507, RFC 2508 and RFC 3545. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3545: Enhanced Compressed RTP (CRTP) for Links with High Delay, Packet Loss and Reordering
Proposed Standard- T. Koren
- S. Casner
- J. Geevarghese
- B. Thompson
- P. Ruddy
- July 2003
- IETF publication
- Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area
Abstract
This document describes a header compression scheme for point to point links with packet loss and long delays. It is based on Compressed Real-time Transport Protocol (CRTP), the IP/UDP/RTP header compression described in RFC 2508. CRTP does not perform well on such links: packet loss results in context corruption and due to the long delay, many more packets are discarded before the context is repaired. To correct the behavior of CRTP over such links, a few extensions to the protocol are specified here. The extensions aim to reduce context corruption by changing the way the compressor updates the context at the decompressor: updates are repeated and include updates to full and differential context parameters. With these extensions, CRTP performs well over links with packet loss, packet reordering and long delays. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes a header compression scheme for point to point links with packet loss and long delays. It is based on Compressed Real-time Transport Protocol (CRTP), the IP/UDP/RTP header compression described in RFC 2508. CRTP does not perform well on such links: packet loss results in context corruption and due to the long delay, many more packets are discarded before the context is repaired. To correct the behavior of CRTP over such links, a few extensions to the protocol are specified here. The extensions aim to reduce context corruption by changing the way the compressor updates the context at the decompressor: updates are repeated and include updates to full and differential context parameters. With these extensions, CRTP performs well over links with packet loss, packet reordering and long delays. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3573: Signalling of Modem-On-Hold status in Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
Proposed Standard- I. Goyret
- July 2003
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) defines a mechanism for tunneling Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) sessions. It is common for these PPP sessions to be established using modems connected over the public switched telephone network. One of the standards governing modem operation defines procedures that enable a client modem to put the call on hold and later, re-establish the modem link with minimal delay and without having to redial. While the modem call is on hold, the client phone line can be used to place or receive other calls. The L2TP base protocol does not provide any means to signal these events from the L2TP Access Controller (LAC), where the modem is physically connected, to the L2TP Network Server (LNS), where the PPP session is handled. This document describes a method to let the LNS know when a client modem connected to a LAC has placed the call on hold. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) defines a mechanism for tunneling Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) sessions. It is common for these PPP sessions to be established using modems connected over the public switched telephone network. One of the standards governing modem operation defines procedures that enable a client modem to put the call on hold and later, re-establish the modem link with minimal delay and without having to redial. While the modem call is on hold, the client phone line can be used to place or receive other calls. The L2TP base protocol does not provide any means to signal these events from the L2TP Access Controller (LAC), where the modem is physically connected, to the L2TP Network Server (LNS), where the PPP session is handled. This document describes a method to let the LNS know when a client modem connected to a LAC has placed the call on hold. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3518: Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Bridging Control Protocol (BCP)
Proposed Standard- M. Higashiyama
- F. Baker
- T. Liao
- April 2003
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCP) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Remote Bridging for PPP links. This document obsoletes RFC 2878, which was based on the IEEE 802.1D- 1993 MAC Bridge. This document extends that specification by improving support for bridge control packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCP) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Remote Bridging for PPP links. This document obsoletes RFC 2878, which was based on the IEEE 802.1D- 1993 MAC Bridge. This document extends that specification by improving support for bridge control packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3437: Layer-Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions for PPP Link Control Protocol Negotiation
Proposed Standard- W. Palter
- W. Townsley
- January 2003
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document defines extensions to the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) for enhanced support of link-specific Point to Point Protocol (PPP) options. PPP endpoints typically have direct access to the common physical media connecting them and thus have detailed knowledge about the media that is in use. When the L2TP is used, the two PPP peers are no longer directly connected over the same physical media. Instead, L2TP inserts a virtual connection over some or all of the PPP connection by tunneling PPP frames over a packet switched network such as IP. Under some conditions, an L2TP endpoint may need to negotiate PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP) options at a location which may not have access to all of the media information necessary for proper participation in the LCP negotiation. This document provides a mechanism for communicating desired LCP options between L2TP endpoints in advance of PPP LCP negotiation at the far end of an L2TP tunnel, as well as a mechanism for communicating the negotiated LCP options back to where the native PPP link resides. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines extensions to the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) for enhanced support of link-specific Point to Point Protocol (PPP) options. PPP endpoints typically have direct access to the common physical media connecting them and thus have detailed knowledge about the media that is in use. When the L2TP is used, the two PPP peers are no longer directly connected over the same physical media. Instead, L2TP inserts a virtual connection over some or all of the PPP connection by tunneling PPP frames over a packet switched network such as IP. Under some conditions, an L2TP endpoint may need to negotiate PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP) options at a location which may not have access to all of the media information necessary for proper participation in the LCP negotiation. This document provides a mechanism for communicating desired LCP options between L2TP endpoints in advance of PPP LCP negotiation at the far end of an L2TP tunnel, as well as a mechanism for communicating the negotiated LCP options back to where the native PPP link resides. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3438: BCP 68: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations Update
Best Current Practice- W. Townsley
- December 2002
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document describes updates to the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) considerations for the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Abstract
This document describes updates to the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) considerations for the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
RFC 3336: PPP Over Asynchronous Transfer Mode Adaptation Layer 2 (AAL2)
Proposed Standard- B. Thompson
- T. Koren
- B. Buffam
- December 2002
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method for
transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links.
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method for
transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links.
RFC 3337: Class Extensions for PPP over Asynchronous Transfer Mode Adaptation Layer 2
Proposed Standard- B. Thompson
- T. Koren
- B. Buffam
- December 2002
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
PPP over ATM Adaptation Layer 2 defines the encapsulation that allows a PPP session to be transported over an ATM virtual circuit using the AAL2 adaptation layer. This document defines a set of class extensions to PPP over AAL2 that implement equivalent functionality to Multi Class Multi Link PPP over a single ATM virtual circuit. Instead of using Multi Link PPP as the basis for fragmentation functionality, this document uses the functionality of the Segmentation and Reassembly Service Specific Convergence Sublayer that is already required as the basic encapsulation format of PPP over AAL2.
Abstract
PPP over ATM Adaptation Layer 2 defines the encapsulation that allows a PPP session to be transported over an ATM virtual circuit using the AAL2 adaptation layer. This document defines a set of class extensions to PPP over AAL2 that implement equivalent functionality to Multi Class Multi Link PPP over a single ATM virtual circuit. Instead of using Multi Link PPP as the basis for fragmentation functionality, this document uses the functionality of the Segmentation and Reassembly Service Specific Convergence Sublayer that is already required as the basic encapsulation format of PPP over AAL2.
RFC 3241: Robust Header Compression (ROHC) over PPP
Proposed Standard- C. Bormann
- May 2002
- IETF publication
- Transport Area
Abstract
This document describes an option for negotiating the use of robust header compression (ROHC) on IP datagrams transmitted over the Point- to-Point Protocol (PPP). It defines extensions to the PPP Control Protocols for IPv4 and IPv6. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes an option for negotiating the use of robust header compression (ROHC) on IP datagrams transmitted over the Point- to-Point Protocol (PPP). It defines extensions to the PPP Control Protocols for IPv4 and IPv6. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3255: Extending Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) over Synchronous Optical NETwork/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) with virtual concatenation, high order and low order payloads
Proposed Standard- N. Jones
- C. Murton
- April 2002
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes an extension to the mapping of Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) into Synchronous Optical NETwork/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) to include the use of SONET/SDH SPE/VC virtual concatenation and the use of both high order and low order payloads. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes an extension to the mapping of Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) into Synchronous Optical NETwork/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) to include the use of SONET/SDH SPE/VC virtual concatenation and the use of both high order and low order payloads. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3186: MAPOS/PPP Tunneling mode
Informational- S. Shimizu
- T. Kawano
- K. Murakami
- E. Beier
- December 2001
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document specifies tunneling configuration over MAPOS (Multiple Access Protocol over SONET/SDH) networks. Using this mode, a MAPOS network can provide transparent point-to-point link for PPP over SONET/SDH (Packet over SONET/SDH, POS) without any additional overhead. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document specifies tunneling configuration over MAPOS (Multiple Access Protocol over SONET/SDH) networks. Using this mode, a MAPOS network can provide transparent point-to-point link for PPP over SONET/SDH (Packet over SONET/SDH, POS) without any additional overhead. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 3153: PPP Multiplexing
Proposed Standard- R. Pazhyannur
- I. Ali
- C. Fox
- August 2001
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes a method to reduce the PPP (Point-to-Point Protocol) framing overhead used to transport small packets over slow links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes a method to reduce the PPP (Point-to-Point Protocol) framing overhead used to transport small packets over slow links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3145: L2TP Disconnect Cause Information
Proposed Standard- R. Verma
- M. Verma
- J. Carlson
- July 2001
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document provides an extension to the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol ("L2TP"), a mechanism for tunneling Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) sessions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document provides an extension to the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol ("L2TP"), a mechanism for tunneling Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) sessions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3078: Microsoft Point-To-Point Encryption (MPPE) Protocol
Informational- G. Pall
- G. Zorn
- March 2001
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Microsoft Point to Point Encryption (MPPE) to enhance the confidentiality of PPP-encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Microsoft Point to Point Encryption (MPPE) to enhance the confidentiality of PPP-encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 3079: Deriving Keys for use with Microsoft Point-to-Point Encryption (MPPE)
Informational- G. Zorn
- March 2001
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document describes the method used to derive initial MPPE session keys from a variety of credential types. It is expected that this memo will be updated whenever Microsoft defines a new key derivation method for MPPE, since its primary purpose is to provide an open, easily accessible reference for third-parties wishing to interoperate with Microsoft products. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document describes the method used to derive initial MPPE session keys from a variety of credential types. It is expected that this memo will be updated whenever Microsoft defines a new key derivation method for MPPE, since its primary purpose is to provide an open, easily accessible reference for third-parties wishing to interoperate with Microsoft products. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 3017: XML DTD for Roaming Access Phone Book
Proposed Standard- M. Riegel
- G. Zorn
- December 2000
- IETF publication
- Operations and Management Area
Abstract
This document defines the syntax as well as the semantics of the information to be included in the phone book for roaming applications. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the syntax as well as the semantics of the information to be included in the phone book for roaming applications. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2878: PPP Bridging Control Protocol (BCP)
Proposed Standard- M. Higashiyama
- F. Baker
- July 2000
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring Remote Bridging for PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 3518
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring Remote Bridging for PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2823: PPP over Simple Data Link (SDL) using SONET/SDH with ATM-like framing
Experimental- J. Carlson
- P. Langner
- E. Hernandez-Valencia
- J. Manchester
- May 2000
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document extends methods found in the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) and RFCs 1662 and 2615 to include a new encapsulation for PPP called Simple Data Link (SDL). SDL provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links, and RFCs 1662 and 2615 provide a means to carry PPP over Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) circuits. SDL provides a very low overhead alternative to HDLC-like encapsulation, and can also be used on SONET/SDH links. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document extends methods found in the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) and RFCs 1662 and 2615 to include a new encapsulation for PPP called Simple Data Link (SDL). SDL provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links, and RFCs 1662 and 2615 provide a means to carry PPP over Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) circuits. SDL provides a very low overhead alternative to HDLC-like encapsulation, and can also be used on SONET/SDH links. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 2759: Microsoft PPP CHAP Extensions, Version 2
Informational- G. Zorn
- January 2000
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes version two of Microsoft's PPP CHAP dialect (MS-CHAP-V2). MS-CHAP-V2 is similar to, but incompatible with, MS-CHAP version one (MS-CHAP-V1). This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document describes version two of Microsoft's PPP CHAP dialect (MS-CHAP-V2). MS-CHAP-V2 is similar to, but incompatible with, MS-CHAP version one (MS-CHAP-V1). This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2716: PPP EAP TLS Authentication Protocol
Experimental- B. Aboba
- D. Simon
- October 1999
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links.The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) is a PPP extension that provides support for additional authentication methods within PPP. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
- Obsoleted by RFC 5216
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links.The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) is a PPP extension that provides support for additional authentication methods within PPP. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 2686: The Multi-Class Extension to Multi-Link PPP
Proposed Standard- C. Bormann
- September 1999
- IETF publication
- Transport Area
Abstract
This document proposes the fragment-oriented solution for the real-time encapsulation format part of the architecture. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document proposes the fragment-oriented solution for the real-time encapsulation format part of the architecture. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2687: PPP in a Real-time Oriented HDLC-like Framing
Proposed Standard- C. Bormann
- September 1999
- IETF publication
- Transport Area
Abstract
This document proposes the suspend/resume-oriented solution for the real-time encapsulation format part of the architecture. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document proposes the suspend/resume-oriented solution for the real-time encapsulation format part of the architecture. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2701: Nortel Networks Multi-link Multi-node PPP Bundle Discovery Protocol
Informational- G. Malkin
- September 1999
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document specifies a standard way for Multi-link PPP to operate across multiple nodes. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document specifies a standard way for Multi-link PPP to operate across multiple nodes. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2661: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol "L2TP"
Proposed Standard- W. Townsley
- A. Valencia
- A. Rubens
- G. Pall
- G. Zorn
- B. Palter
- August 1999
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2637: Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)
Informational- K. Hamzeh
- G. Pall
- W. Verthein
- J. Taarud
- W. Little
- G. Zorn
- July 1999
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document specifies a protocol which allows the Point to Point Protocol (PPP) to be tunneled through an IP network. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document specifies a protocol which allows the Point to Point Protocol (PPP) to be tunneled through an IP network. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2607: Proxy Chaining and Policy Implementation in Roaming
Informational- B. Aboba
- J. Vollbrecht
- June 1999
- IETF publication
- Operations and Management Area
Abstract
This document describes how proxy chaining and policy implementation can be supported in roaming systems. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document describes how proxy chaining and policy implementation can be supported in roaming systems. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2615: PPP over SONET/SDH
Proposed Standard- A. Malis
- W. Simpson
- June 1999
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of PPP over Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) circuits. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the use of PPP over Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) circuits. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2509: IP Header Compression over PPP
Proposed Standard- M. Engan
- S. Casner
- C. Bormann
- February 1999
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes an option for negotiating the use of header compression on IP datagrams transmitted over the Point-to-Point Protocol. It defines extensions to the PPP Control Protocols for IPv4 and IPv6. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 3544
Abstract
This document describes an option for negotiating the use of header compression on IP datagrams transmitted over the Point-to-Point Protocol. It defines extensions to the PPP Control Protocols for IPv4 and IPv6. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2477: Criteria for Evaluating Roaming Protocols
Informational- B. Aboba
- G. Zorn
- January 1999
- IETF publication
- Operations and Management Area
Abstract
This document describes requirements for the provisioning of "roaming capability" for dialup Internet users. "Roaming capability" is defined as the ability to use multiple Internet service providers (ISPs), while maintaining a formal, customer-vendor relationship with only one. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document describes requirements for the provisioning of "roaming capability" for dialup Internet users. "Roaming capability" is defined as the ability to use multiple Internet service providers (ISPs), while maintaining a formal, customer-vendor relationship with only one. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2484: PPP LCP Internationalization Configuration Option
Proposed Standard- G. Zorn
- January 1999
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP), which allows negotiation of an Authentication Protocol for authenticating its peer before allowing Network Layer protocols to transmit over the link. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP), which allows negotiation of an Authentication Protocol for authenticating its peer before allowing Network Layer protocols to transmit over the link. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2486: The Network Access Identifier
Proposed Standard- B. Aboba
- M. Beadles
- January 1999
- IETF publication
- Operations and Management Area
Abstract
This document proposes syntax for the Network Access Identifier (NAI), the userID submitted by the client during PPP authentication. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4282
Abstract
This document proposes syntax for the Network Access Identifier (NAI), the userID submitted by the client during PPP authentication. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2472: IP Version 6 over PPP
Proposed Standard- D. Haskin
- E. Allen
- December 1998
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the method for transmission of IP Version 6 packets over PPP links as well as the Network Control Protocol (NCP) for establishing and configuring the IPv6 over PPP. It also specifies the method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses on PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 5072, RFC 5172
Abstract
This document defines the method for transmission of IP Version 6 packets over PPP links as well as the Network Control Protocol (NCP) for establishing and configuring the IPv6 over PPP. It also specifies the method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses on PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2433: Microsoft PPP CHAP Extensions
Informational- G. Zorn
- S. Cobb
- October 1998
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol and a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol and a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2419: The PPP DES Encryption Protocol, Version 2 (DESE-bis)
Proposed Standard- K. Sklower
- G. Meyer
- September 1998
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document provides specific details for the use of the DES standard for encrypting PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document provides specific details for the use of the DES standard for encrypting PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2420: The PPP Triple-DES Encryption Protocol (3DESE)
Proposed Standard- H. Kummert
- September 1998
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document provides specific details for the use of the Triple-DES standard (3DES) for encrypting PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document provides specific details for the use of the Triple-DES standard (3DES) for encrypting PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2363: PPP Over FUNI
Proposed Standard- G. Gross
- M. Kaycee
- A. Li
- A. Malis
- J. Stephens
- July 1998
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of ATM Frame User Network Interface (FUNI) for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the use of ATM Frame User Network Interface (FUNI) for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2364: PPP Over AAL5
Proposed Standard- G. Gross
- M. Kaycee
- A. Li
- A. Malis
- J. Stephens
- July 1998
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of ATM Adaptation Layer 5 (AAL5) for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the use of ATM Adaptation Layer 5 (AAL5) for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2284: PPP Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)
Proposed Standard- L. Blunk
- J. Vollbrecht
- March 1998
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, which allows negotiation of an Authentication Protocol for authenticating its peer before allowing Network Layer protocols to transmit over the link. This document defines the PPP Extensible Authentication Protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 3748
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, which allows negotiation of an Authentication Protocol for authenticating its peer before allowing Network Layer protocols to transmit over the link. This document defines the PPP Extensible Authentication Protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2290: Mobile-IPv4 Configuration Option for PPP IPCP
Proposed Standard- J. Solomon
- S. Glass
- February 1998
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
Mobile IP [RFC 2002] defines media-independent procedures by which a Mobile Node can maintain existing transport and application-layer connections despite changing its point-of-attachment to the Internet and without changing its IP address. PPP [RFC 1661] provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol packets over point-to-point links. As currently specified, Mobile IP Foreign Agents which support Mobile Node connections via PPP can do so only by first assigning unique addresses to those Mobile Nodes, defeating one of the primary advantages of Foreign Agents. This documents corrects this problem by defining the Mobile-IPv4 Configuration Option to the Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP) [RFC 1332]. Using this option, two peers can communicate their support for Mobile IP during the IPCP phase of PPP. Familiarity with Mobile IP [RFC 2002], IPCP [RFC 1332], and PPP [RFC 1661] is assumed. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
Mobile IP [RFC 2002] defines media-independent procedures by which a Mobile Node can maintain existing transport and application-layer connections despite changing its point-of-attachment to the Internet and without changing its IP address. PPP [RFC 1661] provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol packets over point-to-point links. As currently specified, Mobile IP Foreign Agents which support Mobile Node connections via PPP can do so only by first assigning unique addresses to those Mobile Nodes, defeating one of the primary advantages of Foreign Agents. This documents corrects this problem by defining the Mobile-IPv4 Configuration Option to the Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP) [RFC 1332]. Using this option, two peers can communicate their support for Mobile IP during the IPCP phase of PPP. Familiarity with Mobile IP [RFC 2002], IPCP [RFC 1332], and PPP [RFC 1661] is assumed. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2194: Review of Roaming Implementations
Informational- B. Aboba
- J. Lu
- J. Alsop
- J. Ding
- W. Wang
- September 1997
- IETF publication
- Operations and Management Area
Abstract
This document reviews the design and functionality of existing roaming implementations. Examples of cases where roaming capability might be required include ISP "confederations" and ISP-provided corporate network access support. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document reviews the design and functionality of existing roaming implementations. Examples of cases where roaming capability might be required include ISP "confederations" and ISP-provided corporate network access support. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 2153: PPP Vendor Extensions
Informational- W. Simpson
- May 1997
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring, and testing the data-link connection; and a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. This document provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring, and testing the data-link connection; and a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. This document provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 2118: Microsoft Point-To-Point Compression (MPPC) Protocol
Informational- G. Pall
- March 1997
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Microsoft Point to Point Compression protocol (also referred to as MPPC in this document) for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Microsoft Point to Point Compression protocol (also referred to as MPPC in this document) for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 2125: The PPP Bandwidth Allocation Protocol (BAP) / The PPP Bandwidth Allocation Control Protocol (BACP)
Proposed Standard- C. Richards
- K. Smith
- March 1997
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document proposes a method to manage the dynamic bandwidth allocation of implementations supporting the PPP multilink protocol. This is done by defining the Bandwidth Allocation Protocol (BAP), as well as its associated control protocol, the Bandwidth Allocation Control Protocol (BACP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document proposes a method to manage the dynamic bandwidth allocation of implementations supporting the PPP multilink protocol. This is done by defining the Bandwidth Allocation Protocol (BAP), as well as its associated control protocol, the Bandwidth Allocation Control Protocol (BACP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2097: The PPP NetBIOS Frames Control Protocol (NBFCP)
Proposed Standard- G. Pall
- January 1997
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the NBF protocol over PPP. The NBFCP protocol is only applicable for an end system to connect to a peer system or the LAN that peer system is connected to. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the NBF protocol over PPP. The NBFCP protocol is only applicable for an end system to connect to a peer system or the LAN that peer system is connected to. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2023: IP Version 6 over PPP
Proposed Standard- D. Haskin
- E. Allen
- October 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the method for transmission of IP Version 6 [2] packets over PPP links as well as the Network Control Protocol (NCP) for establishing and configuring the IPv6 over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 2472
Abstract
This document defines the method for transmission of IP Version 6 [2] packets over PPP links as well as the Network Control Protocol (NCP) for establishing and configuring the IPv6 over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2043: The PPP SNA Control Protocol (SNACP)
Proposed Standard- A. Fuqua
- October 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocols for establishing and configuring Systems Network Architecture (SNA) over PPP and SNA over LLC 802.2 over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocols for establishing and configuring Systems Network Architecture (SNA) over PPP and SNA over LLC 802.2 over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1963: PPP Serial Data Transport Protocol (SDTP)
Informational- K. Schneider
- S. Venters
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes a new Network level protocol (from the PPP point of view), PPP Serial Data Transport Protocol, that provides encapsulation and an associated control protocol for transporting serial data streams over a PPP link. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document describes a new Network level protocol (from the PPP point of view), PPP Serial Data Transport Protocol, that provides encapsulation and an associated control protocol for transporting serial data streams over a PPP link. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1967: PPP LZS-DCP Compression Protocol (LZS-DCP)
Informational- K. Schneider
- R. Friend
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Stac LZS data compression algorithm for compressing PPP encapsulated packets, using a DCP header [6]. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Stac LZS data compression algorithm for compressing PPP encapsulated packets, using a DCP header [6]. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1974: PPP Stac LZS Compression Protocol
Informational- R. Friend
- W. Simpson
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Stac LZS data compression algorithm, with single or multiple compression histories, for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Stac LZS data compression algorithm, with single or multiple compression histories, for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1975: PPP Magnalink Variable Resource Compression
Informational- D. Schremp
- J. Black
- J. Weiss
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Magnalink Variable Resource Compression Algorithm (MVRCA) allows a wide range of interoperable compression implementations whose performance characteristics are a function of available CPU and memory resources. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
The Magnalink Variable Resource Compression Algorithm (MVRCA) allows a wide range of interoperable compression implementations whose performance characteristics are a function of available CPU and memory resources. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1976: PPP for Data Compression in Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE)
Informational- K. Schneider
- S. Venters
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines a specific set of parameters for these protocols and an LCP extension to define a standard way of using PPP for data compression of serial data in Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE). This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document defines a specific set of parameters for these protocols and an LCP extension to define a standard way of using PPP for data compression of serial data in Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE). This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1977: PPP BSD Compression Protocol
Informational- V. Schryver
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Unix Compress compression protocol for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Unix Compress compression protocol for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1978: PPP Predictor Compression Protocol
Informational- D. Rand
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Predictor data compression algorithm for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Predictor data compression algorithm for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1979: PPP Deflate Protocol
Informational- J. Woods
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of the PPP Deflate compression protocol for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document describes the use of the PPP Deflate compression protocol for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1989: PPP Link Quality Monitoring
Draft Standard- W. Simpson
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines a protocol for generating Link-Quality-Reports. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines a protocol for generating Link-Quality-Reports. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1990: The PPP Multilink Protocol (MP)
Draft Standard- K. Sklower
- B. Lloyd
- G. McGregor
- D. Carr
- T. Coradetti
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document proposes a method for splitting, recombining and sequencing datagrams across multiple logical data links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document proposes a method for splitting, recombining and sequencing datagrams across multiple logical data links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1993: PPP Gandalf FZA Compression Protocol
Informational- A. Barbir
- D. Carr
- W. Simpson
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Gandalf FZA data compression algorithm [3] for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This document describes the use of the Gandalf FZA data compression algorithm [3] for compressing PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1994: PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP)
Draft Standard- W. Simpson
- August 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines a method for Authentication using PPP, which uses a random Challenge, with a cryptographically hashed Response which depends upon the Challenge and a secret key. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines a method for Authentication using PPP, which uses a random Challenge, with a cryptographically hashed Response which depends upon the Challenge and a secret key. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1962: The PPP Compression Control Protocol (CCP)
Proposed Standard- D. Rand
- June 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines a method for negotiating data compression over PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines a method for negotiating data compression over PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1968: The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP)
Proposed Standard- G. Meyer
- June 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines a method for negotiating data encryption over PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines a method for negotiating data encryption over PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1969: The PPP DES Encryption Protocol (DESE)
Informational- K. Sklower
- G. Meyer
- June 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document provides specific details for the use of the DES standard [5, 6] for encrypting PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
- Obsoleted by RFC 2419
Abstract
This document provides specific details for the use of the DES standard [5, 6] for encrypting PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1973: PPP in Frame Relay
Proposed Standard- W. Simpson
- June 1996
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of Frame Relay for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the use of Frame Relay for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1934: Ascend's Multilink Protocol Plus (MP+)
Informational- K. Smith
- April 1996
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document proposes an extension to the PPP Multilink Protocol (MP) [1]. Multilink Protocol Plus (MP+) is a new control protocol for managing multiple data links that are bundled by MP. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document proposes an extension to the PPP Multilink Protocol (MP) [1]. Multilink Protocol Plus (MP+) is a new control protocol for managing multiple data links that are bundled by MP. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1915: BCP 3: Variance for The PPP Compression Control Protocol and The PPP Encryption Control Protocol
Best Current Practice- F. Kastenholz
- February 1996
- Legacy publication
Abstract
The PPP Working group has developed two protocols, one to control compression on PPP links; the Compression Control Protocol (CCP), documented in draft-ietf-pppext-compression-04.txt. The second is the Encryption Control Protocol (ECP), used to control encryption on serial links, documented in draft-ietf-pppext-encryption-03.txt. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Abstract
The PPP Working group has developed two protocols, one to control compression on PPP links; the Compression Control Protocol (CCP), documented in draft-ietf-pppext-compression-04.txt. The second is the Encryption Control Protocol (ECP), used to control encryption on serial links, documented in draft-ietf-pppext-encryption-03.txt. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
RFC 1877: PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol Extensions for Name Server Addresses
Informational- S. Cobb
- December 1995
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document extends the NCP for establishing and configuring the Internet Protocol over PPP [2], defining the negotiation of primary and secondary Domain Name System (DNS) [3] and NetBIOS Name Server (NBNS) [4] addresses. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document extends the NCP for establishing and configuring the Internet Protocol over PPP [2], defining the negotiation of primary and secondary Domain Name System (DNS) [3] and NetBIOS Name Server (NBNS) [4] addresses. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1841: PPP Network Control Protocol for LAN Extension
Informational- J. Chapman
- D. Coli
- A. Harvey
- B. Jensen
- K. Rowett
- September 1995
- Legacy publication
RFC 1762: The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP)
Draft Standard- S. Senum
- March 1995
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Digital's DNA Phase IV Routing protocol (DECnet Phase IV) over PPP. This document applies only to DNA Phase IV Routing messages (both data and control), and not to other DNA Phase IV protocols (MOP, LAT, etc). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Digital's DNA Phase IV Routing protocol (DECnet Phase IV) over PPP. This document applies only to DNA Phase IV Routing messages (both data and control), and not to other DNA Phase IV protocols (MOP, LAT, etc). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1763: The PPP Banyan Vines Control Protocol (BVCP)
Historic- S. Senum
- March 1995
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the Banyan VINES protocol over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the Banyan VINES protocol over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1764: The PPP XNS IDP Control Protocol (XNSCP)
Historic- S. Senum
- March 1995
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the Xerox Network Systems (XNS) Internet Datagram Protocol (IDP) over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the Xerox Network Systems (XNS) Internet Datagram Protocol (IDP) over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1717: The PPP Multilink Protocol (MP)
Proposed Standard- K. Sklower
- B. Lloyd
- G. McGregor
- D. Carr
- November 1994
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document proposes a method for splitting, recombining and sequencing datagrams across multiple logical data links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1990
Abstract
This document proposes a method for splitting, recombining and sequencing datagrams across multiple logical data links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1661: STD 51: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
Internet Standard- W. Simpson
- July 1994
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the PPP organization and methodology, and the PPP encapsulation, together with an extensible option negotiation mechanism which is able to negotiate a rich assortment of configuration parameters and provides additional management functions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the PPP organization and methodology, and the PPP encapsulation, together with an extensible option negotiation mechanism which is able to negotiate a rich assortment of configuration parameters and provides additional management functions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1662: STD 51: PPP in HDLC-like Framing
Internet Standard- W. Simpson
- July 1994
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of HDLC-like framing for PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the use of HDLC-like framing for PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1663: PPP Reliable Transmission
Proposed Standard- D. Rand
- July 1994
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines a method for negotiating and using Numbered-Mode, as defined by ISO 7776 [2], to provide a reliable serial link. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines a method for negotiating and using Numbered-Mode, as defined by ISO 7776 [2], to provide a reliable serial link. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1638: PPP Bridging Control Protocol (BCP)
Proposed Standard- F. Baker
- R. Bowen
- June 1994
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring Remote Bridging for PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 2878
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring Remote Bridging for PPP links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1618: PPP over ISDN
Proposed Standard- W. Simpson
- May 1994
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of PPP over Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) switched circuits. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the use of PPP over Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) switched circuits. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1619: PPP over SONET/SDH
Proposed Standard- W. Simpson
- May 1994
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of PPP over Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Heirarchy (SDH) circuits. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 2615
Abstract
This document describes the use of PPP over Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Heirarchy (SDH) circuits. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1598: PPP in X.25
Proposed Standard- W. Simpson
- March 1994
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. This document describes the use of X.25 for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. This document describes the use of X.25 for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1570: PPP LCP Extensions
Proposed Standard- W. Simpson
- January 1994
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring, and testing the data-link connection. This document defines several additional LCP features which have been suggested over the past few years. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring, and testing the data-link connection. This document defines several additional LCP features which have been suggested over the past few years. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1547: Requirements for an Internet Standard Point-to-Point Protocol
Informational- D. Perkins
- December 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document discusses the evaluation criteria for an Internet Standard Data Link Layer protocol to be used with point-to-point links. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document discusses the evaluation criteria for an Internet Standard Data Link Layer protocol to be used with point-to-point links. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1548: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
Draft Standard- W. Simpson
- December 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the PPP organization and methodology, and the PPP encapsulation, together with an extensible option negotiation mechanism which is able to negotiate a rich assortment of configuration parameters and provides additional management functions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1661
Abstract
This document defines the PPP organization and methodology, and the PPP encapsulation, together with an extensible option negotiation mechanism which is able to negotiate a rich assortment of configuration parameters and provides additional management functions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1549: PPP in HDLC Framing
Draft Standard- W. Simpson
- December 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of HDLC for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1662
Abstract
This document describes the use of HDLC for framing PPP encapsulated packets. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1552: The PPP Internetworking Packet Exchange Control Protocol (IPXCP)
Historic- W. Simpson
- December 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the IPX protocol over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the IPX protocol over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1553: Compressing IPX Headers Over WAN Media (CIPX)
Historic- S. Mathur
- M. Lewis
- December 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes a method for compressing the headers of IPX datagrams (CIPX). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes a method for compressing the headers of IPX datagrams (CIPX). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1471: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Link Control Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
Proposed Standard- F. Kastenholz
- June 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the Link Control Protocol and Link Quality Monitoring on subnetwork interfaces that use the family of Point-to-Point Protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, & 12]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the Link Control Protocol and Link Quality Monitoring on subnetwork interfaces that use the family of Point-to-Point Protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, & 12]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1472: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Security Protocols of the Point-to-Point Protocol
Proposed Standard- F. Kastenholz
- June 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the Security Protocols on subnetwork interfaces using the family of Point-to-Point Protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, & 12]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the Security Protocols on subnetwork interfaces using the family of Point-to-Point Protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, & 12]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1473: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the IP Network Control Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
Proposed Standard- F. Kastenholz
- June 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the IP Network Control Protocol on subnetwork interfaces using the family of Point-to-Point Protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, & 12]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the IP Network Control Protocol on subnetwork interfaces using the family of Point-to-Point Protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, & 12]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1474: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Bridge Network Control Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
Historic- F. Kastenholz
- June 1993
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the bridge Network Control Protocol [10] on subnetwork interfaces using the family of Point-to-Point Protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the bridge Network Control Protocol [10] on subnetwork interfaces using the family of Point-to-Point Protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1376: The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP)
Proposed Standard- S. Senum
- November 1992
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Digital's DNA Phase IV Routing protocol (DECnet Phase IV) over PPP. This document applies only to DNA Phase IV Routing messages (both data and control), and not to other DNA Phase IV protocols (MOP, LAT, etc.). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1762
Abstract
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Digital's DNA Phase IV Routing protocol (DECnet Phase IV) over PPP. This document applies only to DNA Phase IV Routing messages (both data and control), and not to other DNA Phase IV protocols (MOP, LAT, etc.). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1377: The PPP OSI Network Layer Control Protocol (OSINLCP)
Proposed Standard- D. Katz
- November 1992
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring OSI Network Layer Protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring OSI Network Layer Protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1378: The PPP AppleTalk Control Protocol (ATCP)
Historic- B. Parker
- November 1992
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring the AppleTalk Protocol [3] over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring the AppleTalk Protocol [3] over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1334: PPP Authentication Protocols
Proposed Standard- B. Lloyd
- W. Simpson
- October 1992
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines two protocols for Authentication: the Password Authentication Protocol and the Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1994
Abstract
This document defines two protocols for Authentication: the Password Authentication Protocol and the Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1362: Novell IPX over Various WAN Media (IPXWAN)
Informational- M. Allen
- September 1992
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document describes how Novell IPX operates over various WAN media. Specifically, it describes the common "IPX WAN" protocol Novell uses to exchange necessary router to router information prior to exchanging standard IPX routing information and traffic over WAN datalinks. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1634
Abstract
This document describes how Novell IPX operates over various WAN media. Specifically, it describes the common "IPX WAN" protocol Novell uses to exchange necessary router to router information prior to exchanging standard IPX routing information and traffic over WAN datalinks. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1331: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) for the Transmission of Multi-protocol Datagrams over Point-to-Point Links
Proposed Standard- W. Simpson
- May 1992
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines the PPP encapsulation scheme, together with the PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP), an extensible option negotiation protocol which is able to negotiate a rich assortment of configuration parameters and provides additional management functions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1548
Abstract
This document defines the PPP encapsulation scheme, together with the PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP), an extensible option negotiation protocol which is able to negotiate a rich assortment of configuration parameters and provides additional management functions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1332: The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP)
Proposed Standard- G. McGregor
- May 1992
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method of encapsulating Network Layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method of encapsulating Network Layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1333: PPP Link Quality Monitoring
Proposed Standard- W. Simpson
- May 1992
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method of encapsulating Network Layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, which allows negotiation of a Quality Protocol for continuous monitoring of the viability of the link. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1989
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method of encapsulating Network Layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, which allows negotiation of a Quality Protocol for continuous monitoring of the viability of the link. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1220: Point-to-Point Protocol extensions for bridging
Proposed Standard- F. Baker
- April 1991
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document defines an extension of the Internet Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) described in RFC 1171, targeting the use of Point-to- Point lines for Remote Bridging. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1638
Abstract
This document defines an extension of the Internet Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) described in RFC 1171, targeting the use of Point-to- Point lines for Remote Bridging. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1171: Point-to-Point Protocol for the transmission of multi-protocol datagrams over Point-to-Point links
Draft Standard- D. Perkins
- July 1990
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This memo specifies the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) as a Draft Standard Protocol for the Internet community. When it becomes a full Standard, this protocol will be recommended for all TCP/IP implementations that communicate over serial links.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1331
Abstract
This memo specifies the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) as a Draft Standard Protocol for the Internet community. When it becomes a full Standard, this protocol will be recommended for all TCP/IP implementations that communicate over serial links.
RFC 1172: Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) initial configuration options
Proposed Standard- D. Perkins
- R. Hobby
- July 1990
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This memo specifies the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Initial Configuration Options as a Proposed Standard Protocol for the Internet community. When it becomes a full Standard, this protocol will be recommended for all TCP/IP implementations that communicate over serial links.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1331, RFC 1332
Abstract
This memo specifies the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Initial Configuration Options as a Proposed Standard Protocol for the Internet community. When it becomes a full Standard, this protocol will be recommended for all TCP/IP implementations that communicate over serial links.
RFC 1134: Point-to-Point Protocol: A proposal for multi-protocol transmission of datagrams over Point-to-Point links
Proposed Standard- D. Perkins
- November 1989
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This proposal is the product of the Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Comments on this memo should be submitted to the IETF Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group chair by January 15, 1990. Comments will be reviewed at the February 1990 IETF meeting, with the goal of advancing PPP to draft standard status. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1171
Abstract
This proposal is the product of the Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Comments on this memo should be submitted to the IETF Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group chair by January 15, 1990. Comments will be reviewed at the February 1990 IETF meeting, with the goal of advancing PPP to draft standard status. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Subscribe to PPP
Get notified when:
- RFC changes to status, obsoleted by, updates, updated by, or subseries.
- New RFC added to this subject or below
- The subject was merged into another.