X.500
The X.500 directory service
Within this page
X.500 RFCs (83)
RFC 5020: The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) entryDN Operational Attribute
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- August 2007
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document describes the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) / X.500 'entryDN' operational attribute. The attribute provides a copy of the entry's distinguished name for use in attribute value assertions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) / X.500 'entryDN' operational attribute. The attribute provides a copy of the entry's distinguished name for use in attribute value assertions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4510: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- June 2006
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an Internet protocol for accessing distributed directory services that act in accordance with X.500 data and service models. This document provides a road map of the LDAP Technical Specification. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an Internet protocol for accessing distributed directory services that act in accordance with X.500 data and service models. This document provides a road map of the LDAP Technical Specification. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4511: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol
Proposed Standard- J. Sermersheim
- June 2006
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document describes the protocol elements, along with their semantics and encodings, of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). LDAP provides access to distributed directory services that act in accordance with X.500 data and service models. These protocol elements are based on those described in the X.500 Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the protocol elements, along with their semantics and encodings, of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). LDAP provides access to distributed directory services that act in accordance with X.500 data and service models. These protocol elements are based on those described in the X.500 Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4512: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Directory Information Models
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- June 2006
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an Internet protocol for accessing distributed directory services that act in accordance with X.500 data and service models. This document describes the X.500 Directory Information Models, as used in LDAP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an Internet protocol for accessing distributed directory services that act in accordance with X.500 data and service models. This document describes the X.500 Directory Information Models, as used in LDAP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4514: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Distinguished Names
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- June 2006
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The X.500 Directory uses distinguished names (DNs) as primary keys to entries in the directory. This document defines the string representation used in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) to transfer distinguished names. The string representation is designed to give a clean representation of commonly used distinguished names, while being able to represent any distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The X.500 Directory uses distinguished names (DNs) as primary keys to entries in the directory. This document defines the string representation used in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) to transfer distinguished names. The string representation is designed to give a clean representation of commonly used distinguished names, while being able to represent any distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4515: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Search Filters
Proposed Standard- M. Smith
- T. Howes
- June 2006
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) search filters are transmitted in the LDAP protocol using a binary representation that is appropriate for use on the network. This document defines a human-readable string representation of LDAP search filters that is appropriate for use in LDAP URLs (RFC 4516) and in other applications. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) search filters are transmitted in the LDAP protocol using a binary representation that is appropriate for use on the network. This document defines a human-readable string representation of LDAP search filters that is appropriate for use in LDAP URLs (RFC 4516) and in other applications. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4517: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules
Proposed Standard- S. Legg
- June 2006
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
Each attribute stored in a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) directory, whose values may be transferred in the LDAP protocol, has a defined syntax that constrains the structure and format of its values. The comparison semantics for values of a syntax are not part of the syntax definition but are instead provided through separately defined matching rules. Matching rules specify an argument, an assertion value, which also has a defined syntax. This document defines a base set of syntaxes and matching rules for use in defining attributes for LDAP directories. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
Each attribute stored in a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) directory, whose values may be transferred in the LDAP protocol, has a defined syntax that constrains the structure and format of its values. The comparison semantics for values of a syntax are not part of the syntax definition but are instead provided through separately defined matching rules. Matching rules specify an argument, an assertion value, which also has a defined syntax. This document defines a base set of syntaxes and matching rules for use in defining attributes for LDAP directories. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4523: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema Definitions for X.509 Certificates
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- June 2006
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document describes schema for representing X.509 certificates, X.521 security information, and related elements in directories accessible using the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). The LDAP definitions for these X.509 and X.521 schema elements replace those provided in RFCs 2252 and 2256. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes schema for representing X.509 certificates, X.521 security information, and related elements in directories accessible using the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). The LDAP definitions for these X.509 and X.521 schema elements replace those provided in RFCs 2252 and 2256. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4524: COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- June 2006
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document provides a collection of schema elements for use with the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) from the COSINE and Internet X.500 pilot projects.
This document obsoletes RFC 1274 and updates RFCs 2247 and 2798. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document provides a collection of schema elements for use with the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) from the COSINE and Internet X.500 pilot projects.
This document obsoletes RFC 1274 and updates RFCs 2247 and 2798. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4526: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Absolute True and False Filters
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- June 2006
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document extends the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) to support absolute True and False filters based upon similar capabilities found in X.500 directory systems. The document also extends the String Representation of LDAP Search Filters to support these filters. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document extends the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) to support absolute True and False filters based upon similar capabilities found in X.500 directory systems. The document also extends the String Representation of LDAP Search Filters to support these filters. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4530: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) entryUUID Operational Attribute
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- June 2006
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document describes the LDAP/X.500 \'entryUUID' operational attribute and associated matching rules and syntax. The attribute holds a server-assigned Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) for the object. Directory clients may use this attribute to distinguish objects identified by a distinguished name or to locate an object after renaming. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the LDAP/X.500 \'entryUUID' operational attribute and associated matching rules and syntax. The attribute holds a server-assigned Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) for the object. Directory clients may use this attribute to distinguish objects identified by a distinguished name or to locate an object after renaming. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3771: The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Intermediate Response Message
Proposed Standard- R. Harrison
- K. Zeilenga
- April 2004
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document defines and describes the IntermediateResponse message, a general mechanism for defining single-request/multiple-response operations in Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). The IntermediateResponse message is defined in such a way that the protocol behavior of existing LDAP operations is maintained. This message is intended to be used in conjunction with the LDAP ExtendedRequest and ExtendedResponse to define new single-request/multiple-response operations or in conjunction with a control when extending existing LDAP operations in a way that requires them to return intermediate response information. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4510, RFC 4511
Abstract
This document defines and describes the IntermediateResponse message, a general mechanism for defining single-request/multiple-response operations in Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). The IntermediateResponse message is defined in such a way that the protocol behavior of existing LDAP operations is maintained. This message is intended to be used in conjunction with the LDAP ExtendedRequest and ExtendedResponse to define new single-request/multiple-response operations or in conjunction with a control when extending existing LDAP operations in a way that requires them to return intermediate response information. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3727: ASN.1 Module Definition for the LDAP and X.500 Component Matching Rules
Proposed Standard- S. Legg
- February 2004
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document updates the specification of the component matching rules for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and X.500 directories (RFC3687) by collecting the Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) definitions of the component matching rules into an appropriately identified ASN.1 module so that other specifications may reference the component matching rule definitions from within their own ASN.1 modules. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document updates the specification of the component matching rules for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and X.500 directories (RFC3687) by collecting the Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) definitions of the component matching rules into an appropriately identified ASN.1 module so that other specifications may reference the component matching rule definitions from within their own ASN.1 modules. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3687: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and X.500 Component Matching Rules
Proposed Standard- S. Legg
- February 2004
- IETF publication
Abstract
The syntaxes of attributes in a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) or X.500 directory range from simple data types, such as text string, integer, or boolean, to complex structured data types, such as the syntaxes of the directory schema operational attributes. Matching rules defined for the complex syntaxes usually only provide the most immediately useful matching capability. This document defines generic matching rules that can match any user selected component parts in an attribute value of any arbitrarily complex attribute syntax. [PROPOSED STANDARD]
Abstract
The syntaxes of attributes in a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) or X.500 directory range from simple data types, such as text string, integer, or boolean, to complex structured data types, such as the syntaxes of the directory schema operational attributes. Matching rules defined for the complex syntaxes usually only provide the most immediately useful matching capability. This document defines generic matching rules that can match any user selected component parts in an attribute value of any arbitrarily complex attribute syntax. [PROPOSED STANDARD]
RFC 3671: Collective Attributes in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
Proposed Standard- K. Zeilenga
- December 2003
- IETF publication
Abstract
X.500 collective attributes allow common characteristics to be shared between collections of entries. This document summarizes the X.500 information model for collective attributes and describes use of collective attributes in LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol). This document provides schema definitions for collective attributes for use in LDAP.
Abstract
X.500 collective attributes allow common characteristics to be shared between collections of entries. This document summarizes the X.500 information model for collective attributes and describes use of collective attributes in LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol). This document provides schema definitions for collective attributes for use in LDAP.
RFC 3494: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol version 2 (LDAPv2) to Historic Status
Informational- K. Zeilenga
- March 2003
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document recommends the retirement of version 2 of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAPv2) and other dependent specifications, and discusses the reasons for doing so. This document recommends RFC 1777, 1778, 1779, 1781, and 2559 (as well as documents they superseded) be moved to Historic status. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document recommends the retirement of version 2 of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAPv2) and other dependent specifications, and discusses the reasons for doing so. This document recommends RFC 1777, 1778, 1779, 1781, and 2559 (as well as documents they superseded) be moved to Historic status. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2377: Naming Plan for Internet Directory-Enabled Applications
Informational- A. Grimstad
- R. Huber
- S. Sataluri
- M. Wahl
- September 1998
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
Application of the conventional X.500 approach to naming has heretofore, in the experience of the authors, proven to be an obstacle to the wide deployment of directory-enabled applications on the Internet. We propose a new directory naming plan that leverages the strengths of the most popular and successful Internet naming schemes for naming objects in a hierarchical directory. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
Application of the conventional X.500 approach to naming has heretofore, in the experience of the authors, proven to be an obstacle to the wide deployment of directory-enabled applications on the Internet. We propose a new directory naming plan that leverages the strengths of the most popular and successful Internet naming schemes for naming objects in a hierarchical directory. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 2378: The CCSO Nameserver (Ph) Architecture
Informational- R. Hedberg
- P. Pomes
- September 1998
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The Ph Nameserver from the Computing and Communications Services Office (CCSO), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign has for some time now been used by several organizations as their choice of publicly available database for information about people as well as other things. This document provides a formal definition of the client-server protocol. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
The Ph Nameserver from the Computing and Communications Services Office (CCSO), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign has for some time now been used by several organizations as their choice of publicly available database for information about people as well as other things. This document provides a formal definition of the client-server protocol. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 2293: Representing Tables and Subtrees in the X.500 Directory
Proposed Standard- S. Kille
- March 1998
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines techniques for representing two types of information mapping in the OSI Directory: Mapping from a key to a value (or set of values), as might be done in a table lookup, and mapping from a distinguished name to an associated value (or values), where the values are not defined by the owner of the entry. This is achieved by use of a directory subtree. [STANDARDS-TRCK]
Abstract
This document defines techniques for representing two types of information mapping in the OSI Directory: Mapping from a key to a value (or set of values), as might be done in a table lookup, and mapping from a distinguished name to an associated value (or values), where the values are not defined by the owner of the entry. This is achieved by use of a directory subtree. [STANDARDS-TRCK]
RFC 2294: Representing the O/R Address hierarchy in the X.500 Directory Information Tree
Proposed Standard- S. Kille
- March 1998
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a representation of the O/R Address hierarchy in the Directory Information Tree. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines a representation of the O/R Address hierarchy in the Directory Information Tree. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2164: Use of an X.500/LDAP directory to support MIXER address mapping
Proposed Standard- S. Kille
- January 1998
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This specification defines how to represent and maintain these mappings (MIXER Conformant Global Address Mappings of MCGAMs) in an X.500 or LDAP directory. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This specification defines how to represent and maintain these mappings (MIXER Conformant Global Address Mappings of MCGAMs) in an X.500 or LDAP directory. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2247: Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished Names
Proposed Standard- S. Kille
- M. Wahl
- A. Grimstad
- R. Huber
- S. Sataluri
- January 1998
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines an algorithm by which a name registered with the Internet Domain Name Service [2] can be represented as an LDAP distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines an algorithm by which a name registered with the Internet Domain Name Service [2] can be represented as an LDAP distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2258: Internet Nomenclator Project
Informational- J. Ordille
- January 1998
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The goal of the Internet Nomenclator Project is to integrate the hundreds of publicly available CCSO servers from around the world. This document provides an overview of the Nomenclator system, describes how to register a CCSO server in the Internet Nomenclator Project, and how to use the Nomenclator search engine to find people on the Internet. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
The goal of the Internet Nomenclator Project is to integrate the hundreds of publicly available CCSO servers from around the world. This document provides an overview of the Nomenclator system, describes how to register a CCSO server in the Internet Nomenclator Project, and how to use the Nomenclator search engine to find people on the Internet. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 2259: Simple Nomenclator Query Protocol (SNQP)
Informational- J. Elliott
- J. Ordille
- January 1998
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The Simple Nomenclator Query Protocol (SNQP) allows a client to communicate with a descriptive name service or other relational-style query service. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind
Abstract
The Simple Nomenclator Query Protocol (SNQP) allows a client to communicate with a descriptive name service or other relational-style query service. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind
RFC 2251: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3)
Proposed Standard- M. Wahl
- T. Howes
- S. Kille
- December 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to directories supporting the X.500 models, while not incurring the resource requirements of the X.500 Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4510, RFC 4511, RFC 4512, RFC 4513
Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to directories supporting the X.500 models, while not incurring the resource requirements of the X.500 Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2252: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Attribute Syntax Definitions
Proposed Standard- M. Wahl
- A. Coulbeck
- T. Howes
- S. Kille
- December 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a set of syntaxes for LDAPv3, and the rules by which attribute values of these syntaxes are represented as octet strings for transmission in the LDAP protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4510, RFC 4512, RFC 4517, RFC 4523
Abstract
This document defines a set of syntaxes for LDAPv3, and the rules by which attribute values of these syntaxes are represented as octet strings for transmission in the LDAP protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2253: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): UTF-8 String Representation of Distinguished Names
Proposed Standard- M. Wahl
- S. Kille
- T. Howes
- December 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This specification defines the string format for representing names, which is designed to give a clean representation of commonly used distinguished names, while being able to represent any distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4510, RFC 4514
Abstract
This specification defines the string format for representing names, which is designed to give a clean representation of commonly used distinguished names, while being able to represent any distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2254: The String Representation of LDAP Search Filters
Proposed Standard- T. Howes
- December 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a human-readable string format for representing LDAP search filters. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4510, RFC 4515
Abstract
This document defines a human-readable string format for representing LDAP search filters. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2256: A Summary of the X.500(96) User Schema for use with LDAPv3
Proposed Standard- M. Wahl
- December 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document provides an overview of the attribute types and object classes defined by the ISO and ITU-T committees in the X.500 documents, in particular those intended for use by directory clients. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4510, RFC 4512, RFC 4517, RFC 4519, RFC 4523
Abstract
This document provides an overview of the attribute types and object classes defined by the ISO and ITU-T committees in the X.500 documents, in particular those intended for use by directory clients. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2218: A Common Schema for the Internet White Pages Service
Proposed Standard- T. Genovese
- B. Jennings
- October 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document specifies the minimum set of core attributes of a White Pages entry for an individual and describes how new objects with those attributes can be defined and published. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document specifies the minimum set of core attributes of a White Pages entry for an individual and describes how new objects with those attributes can be defined and published. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2219: BCP 17: Use of DNS Aliases for Network Services
Best Current Practice- M. Hamilton
- R. Wright
- October 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
It has become a common practice to use symbolic names (usually CNAMEs) in the Domain Name Service (DNS - [RFC-1034, RFC-1035]) to refer to network services such as anonymous FTP [RFC-959] servers, Gopher [RFC- 1436] servers, and most notably World-Wide Web HTTP [RFC-1945] servers. This is desirable for a number of reasons. It provides a way of moving services from one machine to another transparently, and a mechanism by which people or agents may programmatically discover that an organization runs, say, a World-Wide Web server. Although this approach has been almost universally adopted, there is no standards document or similar specification for these commonly used names. This document seeks to rectify this situation by gathering together the extant 'folklore' on naming conventions, and proposes a mechanism for accommodating new protocols. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Abstract
It has become a common practice to use symbolic names (usually CNAMEs) in the Domain Name Service (DNS - [RFC-1034, RFC-1035]) to refer to network services such as anonymous FTP [RFC-959] servers, Gopher [RFC- 1436] servers, and most notably World-Wide Web HTTP [RFC-1945] servers. This is desirable for a number of reasons. It provides a way of moving services from one machine to another transparently, and a mechanism by which people or agents may programmatically discover that an organization runs, say, a World-Wide Web server. Although this approach has been almost universally adopted, there is no standards document or similar specification for these commonly used names. This document seeks to rectify this situation by gathering together the extant 'folklore' on naming conventions, and proposes a mechanism for accommodating new protocols. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
RFC 2148: BCP 15: Deployment of the Internet White Pages Service
Best Current Practice- H. Alvestrand
- P. Jurg
- September 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document describes the way in which the Internet White Pages Service is best exploited using today's experience, today's protocols, today's products and today's procedures. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Abstract
This document describes the way in which the Internet White Pages Service is best exploited using today's experience, today's protocols, today's products and today's procedures. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
RFC 2116: FYI 11: X.500 Implementations Catalog-96
Informational- C. Apple
- K. Rossen
- April 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document is a revision to [RFC 1632]: A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations and is based on the results of data collection via a WWW home page that enabled implementors to submit new or updated descriptions of currently available implementations of X.500, including commercial products and openly available offerings. [RFC 1632] is a revision of [RFC 1292]. This document contains detailed description of 31 X.500 implementations - DSAs, DUAs, and DUA interfaces. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document is a revision to [RFC 1632]: A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations and is based on the results of data collection via a WWW home page that enabled implementors to submit new or updated descriptions of currently available implementations of X.500, including commercial products and openly available offerings. [RFC 1632] is a revision of [RFC 1292]. This document contains detailed description of 31 X.500 implementations - DSAs, DUAs, and DUA interfaces. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 2120: Managing the X.500 Root Naming Context
Experimental- D. Chadwick
- March 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document describes the use of 1993 ISO X.500 Standard protocols for managing the root context. Whilst the ASN.1 is compatible with that of the X.500 Standard, the actual settings of the parameters are supplementary to that of the X.500 Standard. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document describes the use of 1993 ISO X.500 Standard protocols for managing the root context. Whilst the ASN.1 is compatible with that of the X.500 Standard, the actual settings of the parameters are supplementary to that of the X.500 Standard. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 2079: Definition of an X.500 Attribute Type and an Object Class to Hold Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
Proposed Standard- M. Smith
- January 1997
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document builds on the experimentation to date and defines a new attribute type and an auxiliary object class to allow URIs, including URLs, to be stored in directory entries in a standard way. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document builds on the experimentation to date and defines a new attribute type and an auxiliary object class to allow URIs, including URLs, to be stored in directory entries in a standard way. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1943: Building an X.500 Directory Service in the US
Informational- B. Jennings
- May 1996
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document provides definition and recommends considerations that must be undertaken to operate a X.500 Directory Service in the United States. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document provides definition and recommends considerations that must be undertaken to operate a X.500 Directory Service in the United States. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1823: The LDAP Application Program Interface
Informational- T. Howes
- M. Smith
- August 1995
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document defines a C language application program interface to the lightweight directory access protocol (LDAP). This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document defines a C language application program interface to the lightweight directory access protocol (LDAP). This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1836: Representing the O/R Address hierarchy in the X.500 Directory Information Tree
Experimental- S. Kille
- August 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a representation of the O/R Address hierarchy in the Directory Information Tree [6, 1]. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
- Obsoleted by RFC 2294
Abstract
This document defines a representation of the O/R Address hierarchy in the Directory Information Tree [6, 1]. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 1837: Representing Tables and Subtrees in the X.500 Directory
Experimental- S. Kille
- August 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines techniques for representing two types of information mapping in the OSI Directory. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
- Obsoleted by RFC 2293
Abstract
This document defines techniques for representing two types of information mapping in the OSI Directory. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 1838: Use of the X.500 Directory to support mapping between X.400 and RFC 822 Addresses
Experimental- S. Kille
- August 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines how to use directory to support the mapping between X.400 O/R Addresses and mailboxes defined in RFC 1327 [2]. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
- Obsoleted by RFC 2164
Abstract
This document defines how to use directory to support the mapping between X.400 O/R Addresses and mailboxes defined in RFC 1327 [2]. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 1798: Connection-less Lightweight X.500 Directory Access Protocol
Historic- A. Young
- June 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to the Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 3352
Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to the Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1801: MHS use of the X.500 Directory to support MHS Routing
Experimental- S. Kille
- June 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The key problem in routing is to map from an O/R Address onto an MTA (next hop). This shall be an MTA which in some sense is "nearer" to the destination UA. This is done repeatedly until the message can be directly delivered to the recipient UA. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Abstract
The key problem in routing is to map from an O/R Address onto an MTA (next hop). This shall be an MTA which in some sense is "nearer" to the destination UA. This is done repeatedly until the message can be directly delivered to the recipient UA. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 1802: Introducing Project Long Bud: Internet Pilot Project for the Deployment of X.500 Directory Information in Support of X.400 Routing
Informational- H. Alvestrand
- K. Jordan
- S. Langlois
- J. Romaguera
- June 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This memo describes a proposed Internet Pilot Project that seeks to prove the MHS-DS approach on a larger scale. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This memo describes a proposed Internet Pilot Project that seeks to prove the MHS-DS approach on a larger scale. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1803: Recommendations for an X.500 Production Directory Service
Informational- R. Wright
- A. Getchell
- T. Howes
- S. Sataluri
- P. Yee
- W. Yeong
- June 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document contains a set of basic recommendations for a country- level X.500 DSA. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document contains a set of basic recommendations for a country- level X.500 DSA. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1804: Schema Publishing in X.500 Directory
Experimental- G. Mansfield
- P. Rajeev
- S. Raghavan
- T. Howes
- June 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
In this document we propose a solution using the existing mechanisms of the directory [1] itself. We present a naming scheme for naming schema objects and a meta-schema for storing schema objects in the directory. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Abstract
In this document we propose a solution using the existing mechanisms of the directory [1] itself. We present a naming scheme for naming schema objects and a meta-schema for storing schema objects in the directory. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 1777: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
Historic- W. Yeong
- T. Howes
- S. Kille
- March 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to the X.500 Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the Directory Access Protocol (DAP).This protocol is specifically targeted at simple management applications and browser applications that provide simple read/write interactive access to the X.500 Directory, and is intended to be a complement to the DAP itself. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 3494
Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to the X.500 Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the Directory Access Protocol (DAP).This protocol is specifically targeted at simple management applications and browser applications that provide simple read/write interactive access to the X.500 Directory, and is intended to be a complement to the DAP itself. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1778: The String Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes
Historic- T. Howes
- S. Kille
- W. Yeong
- C. Robbins
- March 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) requires that the contents of AttributeValue fields in protocol elements be octet strings. This document defines the requirements that must be satisfied by encoding rules used to render X.500 Directory attribute syntaxes into a form suitable for use in the LDAP, then goes on to define the encoding rules for the standard set of attribute syntaxes. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 3494
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) requires that the contents of AttributeValue fields in protocol elements be octet strings. This document defines the requirements that must be satisfied by encoding rules used to render X.500 Directory attribute syntaxes into a form suitable for use in the LDAP, then goes on to define the encoding rules for the standard set of attribute syntaxes. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1779: A String Representation of Distinguished Names
Historic- S. Kille
- March 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The OSI Directory uses distinguished names as the primary keys to entries in the directory. Distinguished Names are encoded in ASN.1. When a distinguished name is communicated between to users not using a directory protocol (e.g., in a mail message), there is a need to have a user-oriented string representation of distinguished name. This specification defines a string format for representing names, which is designed to give a clean representation of commonly used names, whilst being able to represent any distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 2253, RFC 3494
Abstract
The OSI Directory uses distinguished names as the primary keys to entries in the directory. Distinguished Names are encoded in ASN.1. When a distinguished name is communicated between to users not using a directory protocol (e.g., in a mail message), there is a need to have a user-oriented string representation of distinguished name. This specification defines a string format for representing names, which is designed to give a clean representation of commonly used names, whilst being able to represent any distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1781: Using the OSI Directory to Achieve User Friendly Naming
Historic- S. Kille
- March 1995
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This proposal sets out some conventions for representing names in a friendly manner, and shows how this can be used to achieve really friendly naming. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 3494
Abstract
This proposal sets out some conventions for representing names in a friendly manner, and shows how this can be used to achieve really friendly naming. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1758: NADF Standing Documents: A Brief Overview
Informational- The North American Directory Forum
- February 1995
- Legacy publication
Abstract
The purpose of this document is to provide a brief overview of the NADF's Standing Document series. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
The purpose of this document is to provide a brief overview of the NADF's Standing Document series. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1684: Introduction to White Pages Services based on X.500
Informational- P. Jurg
- August 1994
- Legacy publication
Abstract
The document provides an introduction to the international ITU-T (formerly CCITT) X.500 and ISO 9594 standard, which is particularly suited for providing an integrated local and global electronic White Pages Service. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
The document provides an introduction to the international ITU-T (formerly CCITT) X.500 and ISO 9594 standard, which is particularly suited for providing an integrated local and global electronic White Pages Service. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1617: Naming and Structuring Guidelines for X.500 Directory Pilots
Informational- P. Barker
- S. Kille
- T. Lenggenhager
- May 1994
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document defines a number of naming and structuring guidelines focused on White Pages usage. Alignment to these guidelines is recommended for directory pilots. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document defines a number of naming and structuring guidelines focused on White Pages usage. Alignment to these guidelines is recommended for directory pilots. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1632: A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations
Informational- A. Getchell
- S. Sataluri
- May 1994
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document is the result of a survey that gathered new or updated descriptions of currently available implementations of X.500, including commercial products and openly available offerings. This document is a revision of RFC 1292. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
- Obsoleted by RFC 2116
Abstract
This document is the result of a survey that gathered new or updated descriptions of currently available implementations of X.500, including commercial products and openly available offerings. This document is a revision of RFC 1292. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1580: FYI 23: Guide to Network Resource Tools
Informational- EARN Staff
- March 1994
- Legacy publication
Abstract
The purpose of this guide is to supply the basic information that anyone on the network needs to try out and begin using tools. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. [FYI 23]
Abstract
The purpose of this guide is to supply the basic information that anyone on the network needs to try out and begin using tools. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. [FYI 23]
RFC 1608: Representing IP Information in the X.500 Directory
Experimental- T. Johannsen
- G. Mansfield
- M. Kosters
- S. Sataluri
- March 1994
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document describes the objects necessary to include information about IP networks and IP numbers in the X.500 Directory. It extends the work "Charting networks in the X.500 Directory" [1] where a general framework is presented for representing networks in the Directory by applying it to IP networks. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document describes the objects necessary to include information about IP networks and IP numbers in the X.500 Directory. It extends the work "Charting networks in the X.500 Directory" [1] where a general framework is presented for representing networks in the Directory by applying it to IP networks. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 1609: Charting Networks in the X.500 Directory
Experimental- G. Mansfield
- T. Johannsen
- M. Knopper
- March 1994
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document presents a model in which a communication network with all its related details and descriptions can be represented in the X.500 Directory. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document presents a model in which a communication network with all its related details and descriptions can be represented in the X.500 Directory. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 1564: DSA Metrics (OSI-DS 34 (v3))
Informational- P. Barker
- R. Hedberg
- January 1994
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a set of criteria by which a DSA implementation may be judged. Particular issues covered include conformance to standards; performance; demonstrated interoperability. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document defines a set of criteria by which a DSA implementation may be judged. Particular issues covered include conformance to standards; performance; demonstrated interoperability. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1567: X.500 Directory Monitoring MIB
Proposed Standard- G. Mansfield
- S. Kille
- January 1994
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB). It defines the MIB for monitoring Directory System Agents (DSA), a component of the OSI Directory. This MIB will be used in conjunction with the APPLICATION-MIB for monitoring DSAs. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 2605
Abstract
This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB). It defines the MIB for monitoring Directory System Agents (DSA), a component of the OSI Directory. This MIB will be used in conjunction with the APPLICATION-MIB for monitoring DSAs. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1558: A String Representation of LDAP Search Filters
Informational- T. Howes
- December 1993
- Legacy publication
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) defines a network representation of a search filter transmitted to an LDAP server. Some applications may find it useful to have a common way of representing these search filters in a human-readable form. This document defines a human-readable string format for representing LDAP search filters. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1960
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) defines a network representation of a search filter transmitted to an LDAP server. Some applications may find it useful to have a common way of representing these search filters in a human-readable form. This document defines a human-readable string format for representing LDAP search filters. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1562: Naming Guidelines for the AARNet X.500 Directory Service
Informational- G. Michaelson
- M. Prior
- December 1993
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document is an AARNet (Australian Academic and Research Network) Engineering Note (AEN-001). AARNet Engineering Notes are engineering documents of the AARNet Engineering Working Group, and record current or proposed operational practices related to the provision of Internetworking services within Australia, and AARNet in particular. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Abstract
This document is an AARNet (Australian Academic and Research Network) Engineering Note (AEN-001). AARNet Engineering Notes are engineering documents of the AARNet Engineering Working Group, and record current or proposed operational practices related to the provision of Internetworking services within Australia, and AARNet in particular. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1484: Using the OSI Directory to achieve User Friendly Naming (OSI-DS 24 (v1.2))
Historic- S. Hardcastle-Kille
- July 1993
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This proposal sets out some conventions for representing names in a friendly manner, and shows how this can be used to achieve really friendly naming. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1781, RFC 3494
Abstract
This proposal sets out some conventions for representing names in a friendly manner, and shows how this can be used to achieve really friendly naming. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1485: A String Representation of Distinguished Names (OSI-DS 23 (v5))
Historic- S. Hardcastle-Kille
- July 1993
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
When a distinguished name is communicated between to users not using a directory protocol (e.g., in a mail message), there is a need to have a user-oriented string representation of distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1779, RFC 3494
Abstract
When a distinguished name is communicated between to users not using a directory protocol (e.g., in a mail message), there is a need to have a user-oriented string representation of distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1487: X.500 Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
Historic- W. Yeong
- T. Howes
- S. Kille
- July 1993
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to the Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1777, RFC 3494
Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to the Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1488: The X.500 String Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes
Proposed Standard- T. Howes
- S. Kille
- W. Yeong
- C. Robbins
- July 1993
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines the requirements that must be satisfied by encoding rules used to render Directory attribute syntaxes into a form suitable for use in the LDAP, then goes on to define the encoding rules for the standard set of attribute syntaxes defined in [1,2] and [3]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 1778
Abstract
This document defines the requirements that must be satisfied by encoding rules used to render Directory attribute syntaxes into a form suitable for use in the LDAP, then goes on to define the encoding rules for the standard set of attribute syntaxes defined in [1,2] and [3]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1491: FYI 21: A Survey of Advanced Usages of X.500
Informational- C. Weider
- R. Wright
- July 1993
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document is the result of a survey asking people to detail their advanced usages of X.500. It is intended to show how various organizations are using X.500 in ways which extend the view of X.500 as a "White Pages" service. This RFC is a product of the Integrated Directory Services Working Group of the Application and User Services Areas of the IETF. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This document is the result of a survey asking people to detail their advanced usages of X.500. It is intended to show how various organizations are using X.500 in ways which extend the view of X.500 as a "White Pages" service. This RFC is a product of the Integrated Directory Services Working Group of the Application and User Services Areas of the IETF. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1417: NADF Standing Documents: A Brief Overview
Informational- The North American Directory Forum
- February 1993
- Legacy publication
Abstract
The purpose of this document is to provide a brief overview of the NADF's Standing Document series. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1758
Abstract
The purpose of this document is to provide a brief overview of the NADF's Standing Document series. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1430: A Strategic Plan for Deploying an Internet X.500 Directory Service
Informational- S. Hardcastle-Kille
- E. Huizer
- V. Cerf
- R. Hobby
- S. Kent
- February 1993
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document describes an overall strategy for deploying a Directory Service on the Internet, based on the OSI X.500 Directory Service. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This document describes an overall strategy for deploying a Directory Service on the Internet, based on the OSI X.500 Directory Service. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1431: DUA Metrics (OSI-DS 33 (v2))
Informational- P. Barker
- February 1993
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a set of criteria by which a DUA implementation, or more precisely a Directory user interface, may be judged. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This document defines a set of criteria by which a DUA implementation, or more precisely a Directory user interface, may be judged. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1384: Naming Guidelines for Directory Pilots
Informational- P. Barker
- S.E. Hardcastle-Kille
- January 1993
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a number of naming guidelines. Alignment to these guidelines is recommended for directory pilots. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1617
Abstract
This document defines a number of naming guidelines. Alignment to these guidelines is recommended for directory pilots. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1373: Portable DUAs
Informational- T. Tignor
- October 1992
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This document comes in two parts. The first part is for regular people who wish to set up their own DUAs (Directory User Interfaces) to access the Directory. The second part is for ISODE-maintainers wishing to provide portable DUAs to users. This part gives instructions in a similar but longer, step-by-step format. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This document comes in two parts. The first part is for regular people who wish to set up their own DUAs (Directory User Interfaces) to access the Directory. The second part is for ISODE-maintainers wishing to provide portable DUAs to users. This part gives instructions in a similar but longer, step-by-step format. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1330: Recommendations for the Phase I Deployment of OSI Directory Services (X.500) and OSI Message Handling Services (X.400) within the ESNET Community
Informational- ESCC X.500/X.400 Task Force
- ESnet Site Coordinating Comittee (ESCC)
- Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
- May 1992
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This RFC is a near verbatim copy of the whitepaper produced by the ESnet Site Coordinating Committee's X.500/X.400 Task Force. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This RFC is a near verbatim copy of the whitepaper produced by the ESnet Site Coordinating Committee's X.500/X.400 Task Force. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1308: FYI 13: Executive Introduction to Directory Services Using the X.500 Protocol
Informational- C. Weider
- J. Reynolds
- March 1992
- IETF publication
- User Services Area
Abstract
This document is an Executive Introduction to Directory Services using the X.500 protocol. It briefly discusses the deficiencies in currently deployed Internet Directory Services, and then illustrates the solutions provided by X.500. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This document is an Executive Introduction to Directory Services using the X.500 protocol. It briefly discusses the deficiencies in currently deployed Internet Directory Services, and then illustrates the solutions provided by X.500. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1309: FYI 14: Technical Overview of Directory Services Using the X.500 Protocol
Informational- C. Weider
- J. Reynolds
- S. Heker
- March 1992
- IETF publication
- User Services Area
Abstract
This document is an overview of the X.500 standard for people not familiar with the technology. It compares and contrasts Directory Services based on X.500 with several of the other Directory services currently in use in the Internet. This paper also describes the status of the standard and provides references for further information on X.500 implementations and technical information. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This document is an overview of the X.500 standard for people not familiar with the technology. It compares and contrasts Directory Services based on X.500 with several of the other Directory services currently in use in the Internet. This paper also describes the status of the standard and provides references for further information on X.500 implementations and technical information. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1292: A Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations
Informational- R. Lang
- R. Wright
- January 1992
- IETF publication
- User Services Area
Abstract
The goal of this document is to provide information regarding the availability and capability of implementations of X.500. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1632
Abstract
The goal of this document is to provide information regarding the availability and capability of implementations of X.500. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1295: User Bill of Rights for entries and listings in the Public Directory
Informational- The North American Directory Forum
- January 1992
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it defines objects for managing Synchronous Optical Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) objects. This document is a companion document with Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1/E1 and DS3/E3 Interface Types, RFC1406 and RFC1407. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1417
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it defines objects for managing Synchronous Optical Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) objects. This document is a companion document with Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1/E1 and DS3/E3 Interface Types, RFC1406 and RFC1407. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
RFC 1274: The COSINE and Internet X.500 Schema
Proposed Standard- P. Barker
- S. Kille
- November 1991
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document suggests an X.500 Directory Schema, or Naming Architecture, for use in the COSINE and Internet X.500 pilots. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
- Obsoleted by RFC 4524
Abstract
This document suggests an X.500 Directory Schema, or Naming Architecture, for use in the COSINE and Internet X.500 pilots. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1275: Replication Requirements to provide an Internet Directory using X.500
Informational- S.E. Hardcastle-Kille
- November 1991
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This RFC considers certain deficiencies of the 1988 X.500 standard, which need to be addressed before an effective open Internet Directory can be established using these protocols and services [CCI88]. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This RFC considers certain deficiencies of the 1988 X.500 standard, which need to be addressed before an effective open Internet Directory can be established using these protocols and services [CCI88]. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1276: Replication and Distributed Operations extensions to provide an Internet Directory using X.500
Historic- S.E. Hardcastle-Kille
- November 1991
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
Some requirements on extensions to X.500 are described in the RFC[HK91b], in order to build an Internet Directory using X.500(1988). This document specifies a set of solutions to the problems raised. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
Some requirements on extensions to X.500 are described in the RFC[HK91b], in order to build an Internet Directory using X.500(1988). This document specifies a set of solutions to the problems raised. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1277: Encoding Network Addresses to Support Operation over Non-OSI Lower Layers
Proposed Standard- S.E. Hardcastle-Kille
- November 1991
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This document defines a new network address format, and rules for using some existing network address formats. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines a new network address format, and rules for using some existing network address formats. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 1278: A string encoding of Presentation Address
Informational- S.E. Hardcastle-Kille
- November 1991
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
There are a number of environments where a simple string encoding of Presentation Address is desirable. This specification defines such a representation. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
There are a number of environments where a simple string encoding of Presentation Address is desirable. This specification defines such a representation. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1279: X.500 and Domains
Experimental- S.E. Hardcastle-Kille
- November 1991
- IETF publication
- Applications Area
Abstract
This RFC considers X.500 in relation to Internet and UK Domains. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Abstract
This RFC considers X.500 in relation to Internet and UK Domains. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1255: A Naming Scheme for c=US
Informational- The North American Directory Forum
- September 1991
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This memo documents the NADF's agreement as to how entries are named in the public portions of the North American Directory. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
- Obsoleted by RFC 1417
Abstract
This memo documents the NADF's agreement as to how entries are named in the public portions of the North American Directory. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
RFC 1249: DIXIE Protocol Specification
Informational- T. Howes
- M. Smith
- B. Beecher
- August 1991
- Legacy publication
Abstract
This RFC defines a mechanism by which TCP/UDP based clients can access OSI Directory Service without the overhead of the ISO transport and presentation protocols required to implement full-blown DAP. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify any standard.
Abstract
This RFC defines a mechanism by which TCP/UDP based clients can access OSI Directory Service without the overhead of the ISO transport and presentation protocols required to implement full-blown DAP. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify any standard.
Subscribe to X.500
Get notified when:
- RFC changes to status, obsoleted by, updates, updated by, or subseries.
- New RFC added to this subject or below
- The subject was merged into another.